In the case of computers, it just allows people to make stupid decisions at the click of a button that have years of consequence. It's not really a solution even if people have to deal with that everyday. He might be able to get back into regular streaming, if a new FPS appears (cost vs income), but your comment just tells me that people are substituting legal frameworks and standards with grit and eagerness to work. So yes, he fucked up, but having a 3 month to 6 month ban could have had the same educational effect.īasically, fairer responses are needed, not just anger and PR-based interpretations - regardless of the 'good/bad' behind the cause.Ģ.
Yep, he cheated causing him to lose his job, and that is not the same as suddenly losing a job.īut again, if people today do not try to move into new roles before automation/machine learning really takes off, is it their fault or the fault of corporations 'progressing' with technology, without educating their current staff? Thanks for your comment, I appreciate it.ġ. Won't happen with how our politics are and for the US how hard it is to get most people to change their way of thinking, we'll probably just end up with a lot of unemployed people who can't making a living. That is why we need to start looking at new ways of our economy and how we pay people and how they make a living.
#How long do you get banned for aimbot in fortnite driver
If someone like a taxi driver, bus driver or truck driver gets caught drunk behind the wheel should we just let them off because they're required to drive to make their money? Fuck no.ģ. I'd imagine that a lot of kids who watched the video of him cheating also attempted to cheat themselves as a direct result of watching that video.Īlso arguing that he shouldn't be banned because his income depends on it is a load of shit, that's on Jarvis and he should have taken that into considerations before he cheated. If 2 people cheated, 1 just being one of the millions of normal players and the other being a YouTube with 2mil subs then yes, that YouTuber should receive a more severe punishment. But that's really what needs to be done.Ĭlick to shrink.Ninja is right about there needing to be different rules for content creators: content creators should receive more severe punishments because when they're cheating and uploading videos of them cheating like Jarvis did they're not just cheating, they're advertising those cheats to millions of people. In September 2018, Nate Hill and Trevor FunkBomb Siegler announced that they had been banned from Fortnite’s competitive Fall Skirmish event for cheating on a stream. REally unrelated to the argument about if he should be banned, but on your concern: Automation is happening. Many of the people you are targeting will be older reliant on that income (he's still living with his parents!) and it's not so easy to change careers as you get older (even if you learn the skills it's a lot harder to get people to give you a chance. he can stream other games if he wants, this isn't even blocking him from video streaming.
and the fact he threw that away is on him, not Epic for banning him). He's not even in college yet! He is young enough to not even truly know what he wants to do in life yet (you're lucky if you do. Meaning he has plenty of chance to find other ways of making money. How does that relate to some one who knowingly cheated and did the action thta caused him to lose his "living"Ģ. The situation you posted is something that will happen to people out of no fault of their own.